Der Nvidia Tegra 3 ist ein Ende 2011 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC (System on Chip) für High-End-Smartphones und -Tablets. Neben dem 1,4 GHz schnellen Prozessorteil. Nvidia Tegra 4 vs Samsung Exynos Octa vs Snapdragon 800 http:// Nvidia has released Shield running their Tegra 4 processor and we've. NVIDIA Tegra 3 VS. Qualcomm Snapdragon S4. HTC One X - Tegra 3 - vs HTC One S - Snapdragon S4. We’ve been dying to get our hands on both the HTC One X and the HTC One S for one particular reason: The two phones finally give us an opportunity in which we can — as closely as possible – compare the performance of the. В NVIDIA Tegra 3 chip. В and the Snapdragon S4. ![]() В (hands- on video here). The One X employs the quad- core Tegra 3 processor while the One S runs on Qualcomm’s MSM8. A Snapdragon S4 Krait CPU with Adreno 2. That said, the One X has a much higher resolution screen (7. HD versus q. HD on the One S), so things are skewed towards the One S’s S4 from the get- go. ![]() The first half of next year should get very interesting for mobile devices. We’re expecting the Qualcomm S4, NVIDIA Kal-El, Texas Instruments OMAP 4470, and Samsung. Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 vs. Nvidia Tegra 4. Both Qualcomm and Nvidia have taken the mobile chipsets to all new level. The processing power of these chips is. NVIDIA Tegra 3. The NVIDIA Tegra 3 (T30) is a quad-core processor for tablets and smartphones that was introduced at the end of 2011. It features four fast clocked. Winner: Tegra 3. Tegra 3 won simply because it was able to display a greater number of frames per second (higher scores are better). However, the S4’s 56. Http:// - We are fortunate enough to have both Tegra 3 and Snapdragon S4 variants of the HTC One X which means only one thing, we need to. Judging GPU performance has a lot to do with how quickly the pixels are refreshed, and fewer pixels makes it easier on the processor. The One X, for example, has 7. One S, which puts its GPU at a disadvantage. ![]() Tegra 3 and Snapdragon S4: A Brief Comparison. Before we get started, let’s compare the processors. The NVIDIA Tegra 3 processor offers four cores and a fifth “battery saver” companion core that can be used for side tasks that do not require quad- core power. NVIDIA explained that the four ARM Cortex A9 cores in Tegra 3 are also capable of scaling down their clock speed automatically in order to meet the demands of applications. If, for example, you’re playing a resource- intensive game, Tegra 3 will power all four cores to 1. GHz and give you all you need. But if you’re just browsing the web, the cores may scale down to 7. MHz each for more efficient battery life. Why?“By operating each core at a lower frequency, each of these cores can also be run at a lower voltage level,” NVIDIA marketing manager Sridhar Ramaswamy explained. Semiconductor physics dictate that the power consumption of a core is proportional to the frequency and the square of the operating voltage. Due to this square law relationship, even a small reduction in voltage would result in a larger reduction in power consumption. Therefore the total power consumption of a quad core CPUВ to process the same workload would be lower than that of a dual core CPU.”Qualcomm’s S4 processor, on the other hand, is powered by two more powerful Cortex A1. Krait” cores. Those cores, much like NVIDIA’s, are capable of scaling the processor clock speed up or down to meet the needs of the applications that take advantage of them. Qualcomm calls this tech “power smart.” The Krait processor is more energy efficient in general. В than the A9, which means it should offer more power without consuming as much energy. Dual- Core vs. Quad- Core, A Video by Texas Instruments. Texas Instruments has already published a video that shows two ARM Cortex A1. Cortex A9 chips in a benchmark test, but we don’t know is if the devices were otherwise identical, or how they actually performed in real life. We’ll go through a series of benchmarks so you can see the numbers for yourselves, but then we’ll also. В walk you through real- world tests of the One X and One S. Overall, we’re expecting the phones to perform similarly to one another — although NVIDIA’s Tegra 3 is expected to blow the S4 away in gaming tests, mainly because NVIDIA has developed games to specifically take advantage of their quad- core CPU. In any case,В let’s dive in first with that video from TI. An. Tu. Tu v. 2. 7. Benchmark, Smart. Bench 2. 01. 2 and And. EMark. First, a brief explanation of what each of these benchmarks does. An. Tu. Tu v. 2. 7. We chose this test because it allows us to see how two cores compete against four cores. In addition, it shows how 2. D/3. D and I/O capabilities of each processor perform. However, the 2. D/3. D tests are resolution dependent so the Snapdragon S4 has an upper hand because it has fewer pixels to render on the One S’s display. Smart. Bench 2. 01. D renders. It’s a standard test that’s frequently used to benchmark phones. Ande. EMark is especially important because it was built by the Embedded Microprocessor Benchmark Consortium. AMD, Intel, NVIDIA, Qualcomm and many others are part of the consortium, so this is a test that’s been standardized and approved by a group of chipmakers and industry insiders. Ande. EMark is capable of testing multicore and multithreading capabilities of a given processor and can also test the Java efficiency of the CPU. Winner: Tegra 3. Higher scores are better in the chart above and we can see that NVIDIA’s Tegra 3 was the clear winner in Ande. Mark Native, Smart. Bench 2. 01. 2 and An. Tu. Tu v. 2. 7. 3. It posted higher scores for every test, although the benchmarks for Smart. Bench 2. 01. 2 were relatively close. Winner: Tegra 3. In this test, Tegra 3 came on top. It’s visible here that the Snapdragon S4 Krait processors were showing their ability to compete nearly head- to- head with four Cortex A9 processors. Quadrant: Quadrant is a popular test that’s used all over various Android forums to compare devices. It’s an accurate test for performing multi- threaded CPU tests, but it doesn’t accurately portray 2. D or 3. D graphics performances because there isn’t an option to change the screen resolution. Winner: В Snapdragon S4, but if anything is clear here both processors absolutely slaughtered the dual- core chips in the Galaxy Tab and Galaxy Nexus. В In this test the Tegra 3 was rendering 3. D graphics for a much higher resolution display than what the S4 had to power. В You’ll see here that the S4 generally outperformed Tegra 3 but that its CPU results fell behind В T3′s. The S4 won Quadrant’s Memory, 2. D and I/O tests but it lagged in the 3. D tests, even though the One S has a lower resolution display. GLBenchmark 2. 1. Egypt Offscreen: В GLBenchmark 2. Egypt” benchmark that tests Open GL ES 2. It also supports “offscreen mode” for rendering to a specific, display- independent resolution. This allows us to test the S4 versus the Tegra 3 without taking the physical. В screen resolutions of the HTC One S and the HTC One X into consideration. Winner: Tegra 3. В Tegra 3 won simply because it was able to display a greater number of frames per second (higher scores are better). However, the S4’s 5. It would be pretty much impossible to distinguish a game playing at 6. Moonbat for Chrome. Moonbat allows users to test the multithreaded CPU performance inside of the Chrome web browser using a series of Java- based tests. In this case, the lower score is better because it means the benchmark finished faster. Winner: Snapdragon S4. В I set the “Webworkers” figure to four for Tegra 3, so that all four cores were running, and set the same figure to two for the S4 to activate both of its cores. The Snapdragon S4 won, completing the tests roughly 3. Tegra 3. UPDATE: We’ve added a second chart and in this case set both processors to run four threads in Moonbat (representing four tabs in Chrome, for example). That means that Tegra 3 will offload one thread to each core while the S4 chip will run two threads on each of its cores. Tegra 3 wins in this test because it’s able to better execute the task across more cores. However, the S4 only has two cores and so we originally ran the first test to reflect that. Gaming: Shadowgun THD Tegra 3 vs Shadowgun (Standard Edition): NVIDIA has created a tweaked version of Shadowgun for Tegra 3 devices. There’s more detail in the 3. D world, which means the game looks better overall. That’s one upside to owning a Tegra 3 device: the company works with developers to create Tegra- specific versions of games (sold through the Tegra Zone application) with much more detail, including water effects, smoke, fire and physics. There’s more glowing effects around lights, for example, and the armor is noticeably much more elaborate on Tegra 3 than on Snapdragon S4. В There are quite a few Tegra- optimized games out now and many more are expected to launch later this year. Shadowgun THD on Tegra 3: Shadowgun (Standard Edition) on Snapdragon S4: В Shadowgun (Standard Edition)It’s not fair to compare the S4 against the Tegra 3 in a game that was specifically designed for the Tegra 3. So in this test, I simply compared the real- world gaming experience of. В Shadowgun. В on both the HTC One S and the One X to see if there were any noticeable differences. Overall the game acted and looked nearly the same on both phones, although the graphics were admittedly a bit more crisp on the One X simply because it has a higher resolution display. What does this tell us? That the S4 can hold its own to the One X when it comes to games that are designed to run across multiple processors. As you’ll note in the screenshots below, there are relatively few differences between the two games. Shadowgun (Standard Edition) on Tegra 3: Shadowgun (Standard Edition) on Snapdragon S4: Conclusion. Tegra 3 Pros: Tegra 3 offers four processing cores (plus a fifth battery saver core), which allows applications to unload onto a larger number of processors. That means you’re splitting the power across four cores instead of just two, which theoretically will help save battery life. NVIDIA is working closely with developers to create special Tegra Zone games. That means you not only have access to the original games in the Google Play store but also the enhanced versions from NVIDIA. Incredible multitasking performance in real world tests. Support for real- time physics and dynamic lighting in games. Tegra 3 Cons: NVIDIA has not yet announced partnerships with U. S. carriers to offer 4. G LTE devices with Tegra 3 in the U. S., but that is likely to change down the road. That means Qualcomm, with its Snapdragon S4 processor, has the upper hand when it comes to providing 4. G LTE chips. Qualcomm is the largest supplier of 4. G LTE radios in the U. S. В To its credit, NVIDIA already has solutions for 4. G LTE support in Japan and the company has partnerships to provide 4. G LTE solutions elsewhere, too. Currently only available in the One X, LG’s upcoming Optimus 4. X HD and the ASUS Transformer Prime tablet. HTC One X Benchmarks: Tegra 3 vs. Snapdragon S4. Ver. Г¶ffentlicht am 0. We are fortunate enough to have both Tegra 3 and Snapdragon S4 variants of the HTC One X which means only one thing, we need to run some benchmarks to compare them. We ran two here, but have plenty more at the site in our review.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2019
Categories |